Real Folk, Real Talk-Episode 2 Weather Mode

For what seems like a decade at least, global warming has always been a smoking propaganda broadway ticket full of hot air. Literally. Is the temperature really hotter? Naturally? Or is it made by mad men? And from what point in history is this increase being used for the purpose of a politically correct argument? But then this is the bigger scandal not being disclosed and ignored by the main stream. Instead it then force feeds a constant guilt trip and conversation about a summer bbq or a monster truck gas guzzler while the sponsor of the ad is some corporate giant.

The initial response to objecting the main stream narrative is often rage, denial, hate, bitter, contempt and slander. The latter being the most important. Isn’t it often said that slander is the tool when the loser has lost the debate. Then how on Earth does one easily, and with what appears to be preconditioned triggers, get so violently agitated when someone else’s perception of the message differs from theirs? Yet, here we are in a rocking boat of hot ashes from all the liars, liars, pants on fire. Thus, in order to even begin to have a conversation about global warming, it is an absolute must to have the same conversation about weather modification. Any other conversation is a waste of breathe then. Because that is eventually the end goal anyways. The powers in charge don’t want any of us breathing air, so they rather spend their tyrant lives dictating to how we live ours right down to playing god and fucking with the weather. Even the cartoons tell us. Mayor Hummdinger plays god when he steals the cloud catcher.

Decade after decade all the media vomits from its dark screen is how the end of the world is near due to global warming and we must change it now before it’s too late. Another election cycle ends and the global warming conversation gets hidden for the most part. To keep the divide and anger active enough prop specialists like Greta Thunberg lead the social revolution hoping to get as many teenage minions on team Greta. Meanwhile the long greedy corporate conglomerate arm reaches past any laws with deductible taxes and or fines for its destruction to Earth for profits. The same lobbyist working for the same government agencies jumping from bed to bed is the ritual bestowed upon this plagued Earth.

So when social media stunts of people sitting in traffic in the name of global warming hit the viral airways it should be universally understood that these are not acts selfless care. Rather, far from it. More like acts of selfish gains in the name of deception and manipulation. A self sacrifice is also an act of Baal or Baphomet worship. Such a demonstration performed are rituals possessed by a satanic cult. Yet, the cause and effect is the greater gain of those seeking a revolution within the yutes. And in many cases a following occurs and real people and real incidents occur are the by product of these public demonstrators and influencers. By gain or seeking gain. Does it matter? When a fool ruins a piece of art in the name of boycotting oil they are worse than an art thief. At least the thief protects the work of art and seeks no gain other than fees for exchanging the ownership to highest bidder whether legally or illegally. The influencer seeks every vanity from fees for damaging the art plus fees for influencing such bad behavior on society. The destroyer of art uses every form of greed for self to destroy everything else in front of them. Art imitates life. Life imitates art. Meanwhile the art thief wants no attention, national recognition or praise for the heist at large. In both cases insurances cover damages, but the art thief still preserves the art and integrity of the craft better than art vandal. Even the art thief has displayed better skills at work and inherently gains more respect within the community and handiwork being performed. However, the art thief will be persecuted far worse than the art destroyer as the propaganda machine is built the praise the behavior of the

vigilante whom is designed to sway public opinion.

Global warming would gain a better track record if most real scientists would scream from the top of the roofs. But hardly is the case. It is a very divided pool. that everything these days. It is again politicians who start wars and kill babies with tax dollars who seem to hell bent on selling global warming. Bought and paid for $cience gets easily gobbled up by truthers. For someone that is born post 9/11 these propaganda sequences may seem hardly the case. But for those that lived half a century are well aware of the constant global warming hoax whether they want to admit it or not. Jumping on gravy trains is a social choice. All choices have consequences. And deciding to agree with mainstream media and the over-reaching arm that sways the masses has one intention. And that driving force is to trigger emotional responses based on the conditioning and use of the public education sector to hinder real information and knowledge. So when slander is the tool of the loser MSM has only one response left and that is to call those that question with rational explanations as conspiracy theorists, who are crazy basement trolls. However, in reality these conspiracy theorists are simply normal functioning person(s) running businesses in a politically correct environment that simply questions irrational events and/or narratives. Instead of listening to some scientists who were Nobel Peace Prize winners and their denied responses to global warming, society is now praising anyone in the sector or outside to slander such professionals. How can anyone possible take the scientific community supposed 'climate change' message seriously when it's own member are disrespected when they bring their own receipts to the table. Instead its all mafia and Nazi bullies dictating scientific policy. In a nutshell, global warming is a cult. And plenty of Nobel Prize winners and other scientists in the sector back this notion.

Nobel Prize winner of Physics in 2022 John F. Clauser said ‘there is no climate crisis."

Svante Arrhenius, a Swedish Nobel Prize winner of Chemistry in 1903. His background and training was in electrochemistry, not climate research. His doctoral thesis was on chemical theory. The work for which he won a Nobel Prize was deemed mediocre at one point before gaining traction. His work on conductivities of electrolytes was first given a fourth class degree. The 150 page dissertation didn't impress at first as his work was studying the relationship between medium ground temperature and the gas pressures in our atmosphere. His tenure at the University of Uppsala eventually soured with professor Per Teodore Cleve, who was the chief instructor who could have overseen Arrhenius' experiments. Instead he bolted for the Physical Institute of the Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm in 1881. His professor was physicist Erik Edlund. The most important value of his work appears to be how he explains how crystalline salts break up into coupled charged ions when dissolved. He continued to send his dissertation to other scientists in Europe and reached out to the new physical chemistry sectors. Wilhelm Ostwald, Rudolf Clausius and Jacobus Henricus van't Hoff were some names more impressed with Arrhenius' work. Even Ostwald came to Uppsala to convince him to join a research group in Riga. Arrhenius declined because he wanted to stay closer to an ailing father. He was raised by Lutheran parents. After his father's death, he ended up reunited with Ostwald in Riga and Jacobus Henricus van 't Hoff in Amsterdam on travel grants. He also worked with Friedrich Kohlrausch in Wurzburg, Germany and Ludwig Boltzmann in Graz, Austria with the grant he had received from the Swedish Academy of Sciences. He would later be elected to the Swedish Academy of Sciences in 1901 which was meet with disapproval. He would also use his status to get his colleagues prizes as well, while at the same time suppressing his competitors and enemies.

However, he was noted as championing the climate sciences, so perhaps an opportunity for the future global warming alarmist to create propaganda instead. His work gave rise to the greenhouse effect and the wonders of atmospheric science. He argued the carbon dioxide was great for crops and our climate. He boasted that our planet would have "more abundant crops", as clearly that is not the message of the modern day dictators and tyrants leaders at the WEF headquarters. Dr. Arrhenius also noted that the excess of carbon dioxide with produce "more equable and better climates"

Kary B. Mullis, also a Nobel Prize winner of Chemistry in 1993 said the global mode predictions are "wrong by a large factor."

1973 Nobel Prize winner Ivar Giaever honored for his contributions to quantum tunneling. In the fall of 2015 Dr. Giaever attended the 65th Nobel Laureate Conference in Lindau, Germany. Of the 65 attendees, only 36 signatures were gained for those willing to claim global warming is real. For those willing to speak out, Ivar sparked some debate. The Nobel Prize winner is quoted as having said: “I would say that basically global warming is a non-problem.” Dr. Giaever was one of 70 plus Nobel Science Laureates that had endorsed Obama back in 2008. However, seven years later he is calling the former President “dead wrong” regarding his info on global warming. In addition he called Obama’s grim and dire warning on global warming to be a “ridiculous statement.” He challenged the President’s claims and discusses his major concerns with the global warming fad. In 2012 when it was his calling to research more he called it the “new religion” and says it can not be questioned like the Catholic Church. He worries of the tyrant community overreach at play with the UN Climate Treaty and warms of alarmist having a strong hold over the comprised committees. He calls out Nature Magazine and other publications for not publishing his works. Ultimately he discusses the importance of CO2, not the hyped up propaganda trying to attack it.

In a nation that thrives on the faux world of lip service, that servitude is perhaps the social change driving a progressive, aggressive and transgression of poorly educated kids indoctrinated with tools that keep them captive of their own devices unable to break free. The biggest misinformation with the climate change propaganda is far worse than the constant guilt trip placed onto to the yutes. Thus, the biggest issue with information overload is that info is labeled as misinformation, while causing disinformation. In other words, the constant narrative on climate change is grossly false. A lie shouted from the rooftops. Thus instead of providing good information, the gatekeepers in charge of educational and public sectors feed malicious content to the masses. This intentionally creates harmful disinformation while PR campaigns that attack any other information. Speaking out against this main stream narrative continues to test the fragile last breathe of free speech that may have already left the building.

So while professionals in the industries or individuals educating themselves on the conversation may know better, only the uninformed will be rewarded for ignorance as a whole. Society and their new army of thought police will then break down the individual for their existence on why their CO2 is a problem. They bully that individual to sacrifice self to some ailing Earth.

While some simple folk are trying to enjoy their weekend with no rain, some other not so regular folk are greedy whores sipping on martini's while their personal chef is spirit cooking their next craving as they decide on legal cases and strategies on how to play god because they needed their cloud seeding efforts to rain on their competitor's parade.


Court cases old and new show plenty of evidence of cloud seeding as just one single form of weather mode. mode, mode. This dates back to the 1950's when weather manipulation bursted on the scene with military ranks doing the dirty deeds. The Pentagon warned of the use of government(s) using use weather modification as weapons of mass destruction upon its early beginnings after the 2nd world war.

But what is rarely repeated and taught is the use of weather mode to constantly battle and create unfair advantages. Science for the People published some nice works regarding the USA's commitment to genocide back in the 1970s. The publication talks about how espionage is always a constant leader hijacking science for power and using the advancement engineers make in sciences and then using those advancements as a weapon instead. Profit is prioritized as the corporation that is the USA entity trumps any concerns over health for the people that occupy the land of free genocide. This issue also dives into the Americanized propaganda of making climate change a driving force to blame the human experience for being alive rather than tackling actual problems of weather modification manufacturing the problem. Its a very simple rinse and repeat business model that creates a problem and offers an instant solution or strategy.

"Air war" they called it back in the day. We've heard the air pollution propaganda song and dance over and over again. Blame game is the same out of date old song and dance and common folk ain't putting on their dancing boots to jump in that country line. The US uses top military secret planning to create weather warfare and turns the seasons into weapons of mass destruction. These seasonal manipulations appear publicly back in 1967 under the alias "Operation Popeye". Using the Vietnam villages and other nations across the Earth the paper trail and documentation continues to mount as the global bully with their hands in the hands off cookie jar is the US time and time again. 

But the prep was done prior for sure. ARPA, the Advanced Research Projects Agency was founded in 1958. The agency changed to DARPA adding the "D" for Defense. But defending what? Defending other nation's fake weather?

In 1972 the US passed the Weather Modifications Reporting Act. Yo, This law allows the not so regular folk a legal entry to play god as long as there is a 10 day notice to your local weather station or what other legal jurisdiction is in charge of letting your hood flood or burn down.

Cancer a political and social problem you say? Nixon and the US, and plenty of presidents after him ran with billions of US tax-slave dollars to jump on the cancer research gravy grant train to combat Cancer. Well, then cancer is just another code word for humans, because they have been the only thing constantly attacked. Nothing is combating cancer as that is clearly big business. Air pollution always blames gas guzzlers that are protected by the oil industries. But the EV game is full of hot burning pants on fire coal too.


But if the WHO, top gangsta, aka World Health Organization know that cancers can be eliminated by cleaning up the air that is never ever ever the conversation. Bad air quality is mentioned constantly but never really discussed on how effectively easily a fix could be in true intentions were the case. It's the same props and actors. And the proof is written in bold letters across the sky. The elite hoods are cleaner with safe blue skies and the poorer hoods are dirty and more infested with poor air quality

What about all the talk lately with DEW, or Direct Energy Weapons. Wild fires are all the rage and whether some are controlled and started legally or not doesn't change the cause and effect. Shot callers on or off the books wanna play fire starter because the fall guy always gets paid, and someone is cooking the books. And a high grade military weapon laser certainly doesn't need any lighter fluid.


Remember the Maui scandal? That whole scene stunk of burnt flesh all the way down to the sacred land that was roasted. From missing kids, to Sleepy Joe talking about being "laser focused on relief" after not taking calls for a week on the matter smells of a dead rat. Prime coastal property that has been eyed by greed developers instantly becomes available as home owners are locked out of their properties. Yet somehow investor conventions are suddenly on schedule to swoop in for the land heist. Homeowners with missing or dead kids are giving a $700 relief check and can't even look for some photo albums. But remember how the homes or umbrellas with blue didn't get hit. Nor did Oprah and her land. Remember Sleepy Joe making a comment about blue roofs? "Laser focused" he said. The whole scandal down to the fire chief leaving with no warning. The kids were home that day from school. The police chief, John Pelletier, was no stranger to danger, as he was also in charge of the 2017 Vegas shooting incident. FEMA was there and claims have surfaced that home owners trying to get some relief were met with unwelcoming vaccine requests before any aid would be offered. Oprah and the Rock had major backlash. Forget the conspiracies, folks were pissed and made their voices heard. All these elements grossly paint a different picture than what the mainstream always is trying to sell. There is a reason good folk are speaking out. The whole Milli Vanilli "Blame It On The Rain." has exceeded its free play on the jukebox.

The bottom line is Climate Change is a not an honest hooker. She'll double dip. First she'll take your dollar to holla and then rob you again with sneaky misdirection and slight of hand like a good magician. Cranking up the oven to cook Hanzel and Gretel, but blaming them burnt cookies is an ugly game of karma the Illuminati clearly love to play. It's just not a serious conversation.

Global warming is fools conversation. Until we discuss global mode, it's a worthless conversation. So until then, the only receipts I"m bringing to the table is the manipulation and lack of transparent conversation. Fancy scientific talk is rubbish anyways. And I'll end with this: Google and translate Latin to English: sci enti fic and the result is know that it is fiction.


Till next time. Much much thanks for tuning in. I hope to see you soon. Cheers. It's been a pleasure. Marc Burgess